Groups and teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Groups and teams - Essay ExampleAll the activities were electrically related as the free radicals were inevitable to design a digital invention for sale at the end of the semester. Two mischievously surgical process groupings or teams were identified and denoted as team A and team B (Borkman). For the purpose of this assignment, the two poorly functioning groups or teams will also be denoted as team A and team B. This constitution elucidates the multiple circumstanceors that caused the poor functioning of each of the two poorly functioning groups, draws a comparison among the two groups in respect to the conflict process in regard to the Tuckmans framework or model. This paper also suggests a resolution to the conflicts and further elucidates why the resolutions will be effective. Team A It is of significance to posit that there is a range of factors that caused the poo functioning of each off the group. Team A was one of the teams involved in the project. In this group off sev en members, Borkman posits that only four of the group members were unfailingly involved in the activities off the team. The former(a) three members of the team failed to actively participate in the activities. One of the factors that caused the poor functioning of the team was leadership. Of the three constantly absent members of the group, one of them initially presumed a leadership role. This persons name was denoted as All Talk and was adopted by other group members. ... As illustrated by Tuckman in his model off development, a team or group ought to identify and recognize authority, as well as role and confabulation arrangements or organizations. In team A, all the members had divergent views and opinions on whether there were too many or too few individuals in positions of leadership. The members had also divergent opinions on whether the leaders at heart the team were legitimate or not. Secondly talk issues also cause the poor functioning of the team. In the forming stage, it was agreed upon that members of the group could either contribute through and through emails or could physically attend group meetings. Though a common discussion tool for communication was proposed and created, the members who physically attended meetings failed to update those who missed the meetings through the discussion tool. Therefore, there was poor communication within the group hence the poor functioning off the team. According to the Tuckmans model of development, communication is zippy or critical for the normal functioning of the team (Borkman). Thirdly, the poor functioning of the team was caused by the fact that some of the members of the group were isolated by the others. When the members were interviewed, it was observed that four members of the group worked consecrate in hand while the other three members were isolated. Therefore, the isolated individuals had divergent opinions and views regarding the project as comp atomic number 18d to the four members who w orked collectively. There are other factors that caused the poor functioning of the group. Some lf the team members were not dedicated and devoted in their work. This is attributed to the absence of three of the members hence the