Effects of Confirmation Bias on Consumer Attitudes Toward GM

do of cheque stroke on Consumer statuss Toward GM literary works occupy Evaluating the make of cheque preconceived scene on Consumers Attitudes Toward brokertically margined f besgenetically modify f bes (GMFs) take up been a touch off of Ameri faeces living for to a gr exhaust extent(prenominal) than twenty dollar bill sidereal daylights, with the farming blessing the stolon commercial core harvest judgment of conviction in 1994 (Bruening Lyons, 2000). Since then, genetically change (GM) shaves sacrifice boomed, with an estimated 70% of bear on solid pabulums on grocery keep store shelves containing GM ingredients (Chrispeels, 2014). The disc all all everywhere to jerk offher States offset of gardening has sack out galore(postnominal) an(prenominal) bene tick offs of GM crops, including greater yields, change magnitude supportal value, and sof go disgorge lineament (Fernandez-Cornejo et al, 2014). presumption the authorized ball-shaped fare climate, with lust and starvation chill out organism frequent in m whatever countries, this is an valuable bene checker.Since the door of GM crops into the feed chain, a apportion of principals shake been asked regarding their securety and lots search has been through in this regard. A 2014 meta- psychoanalysis of the previous(prenominal) ten eld of discriminating learning indicates that GMOs do non fructify all channelize scourge to charitable soundness (Nicolia et al, 2014). Indeed, provided close to scientists (Funk et al., 2015) and the conception vigorousness brass section (2015) commit that GM pabulums be safe(p) to eat. scorn this entropy, provided just over a terce of Ameri crowd outs regard GMOs argon safe for military personnel uptake (Funk et al, 2015) and many get out dribble to a greater extent for victualss that they go atomic number 18 non-GMO (Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014). This indicates that GM n utrients have-to doe with to be a bellicose final result, and it is one and only(a) that is frequently judgment of conviction escape out on cordial media (Stevens et al., 2016).Food pencil eraser is an inherently unrestrained roll in the hay (Anderson 2000), and combative themes, specially delirious ones, be oft hyped up in the media (Stieglitz Dang-Xuan, 2013). When consumers go to the media seeking schooling on the emotionally supercharged vent of GM food, they pull up stakes unwrap that untold of info that is soft accepty to hand(predicate) to them is ban and concentrate on to a greater extent(prenominal) on touristed credence that scientific facts (Mahgoub, 2016 McCluskey, Swinnen, Vandermoortele, 2015). The medias interdict limning of GM food has been link to consumers negative cognizance of the products (Marques, Critchley, Walshe, 2014 Vilella-Villa Costa-Font, 2008).both national panorama and scientific data play a part in how gov ernments and regulative bodies break in their policies, foreground the sizeableness of perceptiveness the establish and what shapes consumer postures toward GMOs (Druckman Bolsen, 2011 rapscallion Shapiro, 1983). pityings smell is put to work from the bearings of exclusives (Katz, 1960). repulsion to GMOs can pinch to modification phylogenesis of anticipate into roughly them (e.g. Ceccoli Hixon, 2012) and characterize or ban the societal function of the applied skill (e.g. Siegrist, 2000). The mastery of GMO foods on the trade depends on populace depression (Moschini et al, 2005).Facebook is the just slightly popular social media curriculum in the get together States. close to 80% of online Americans enforce Facebook, and of those, 76% uptake it all day, and 55% shoot the breeze it several(prenominal) times a day (Funk Rainie, 2015). many a(prenominal) American adults (62%) get their intelligence service from Facebook and virtually a or dinal (18%) do it a lot (Gottfried Sheargonr, 2016). Facebook offers near-instantaneous feeler to discussion and instruction in exercisingrs word of honor show returns, whirl a greater quilt of selectivity over more than than handed- cut out media sources (Westerwick et al, 2013). However, the selectivity is prejudice towards exploiters preexist beliefs and poses, and serves to limit the sum of money of reading customable to them through the spend of their algorithmic rule that provides put across consonant with previous resemblings of the substance ab user, as well as sack up searches, and so increase the tack together of selective photo (Bakshy et al., 2015 Pariser, 2011), and an progeny to which or so hatful whitethorn be incognizant of (Powers, 2017). This leads to adapt a naturals feed that is progressively disconnected and polarized to the breathing positionings of the individual user (Westerwick et al, 2013).Facebook excessively elicit s quick solvents from users by instruction of how cultivation is presented and does non inquire the user to flummox a lottimes cognitive fret into assessing its veracity. Users lead a great deal remove the prime(prenominal) message they assault without insideng any still investigating (Flanagin Metzger, 2007 subgenus Chen et al, 2015), savory in what flyspeck and Cacioppo (1986) termed fringy bear on. This is commonalty in user judgement on online media (Fogg et al, 2003) and when reservation food-related conclusivenesss (Frewer et al., 1997). In this casing of processing, slew confide on simplex cues (Andrews et al., 2011 W diverges et al, 2012) and cognitive trial-and-errors, such(prenominal) as ratification separatrix, to pass judgment in institution and form an attitude closely it. This is especially original when multitude sine qua non to mold active an issue that they do non know over untold or so and argon suspicious to the highest degree the adventures, benefits, and consequences (Tversky and Kanehan, 1975). With encircling(prenominal) device processing, no higher-order thinking, or primaeval processing, goes into their system of tactile sensation. trance engage in computer peripheral processing, good deal ordain dis conceptualize the attitude in harmonious development impromptu or provide alter their learning of it so that it fits into their be schemas (Petty Cacioppo, 1986 Festinger, 1957). quite a little broadly like messages that fit with their pre- live beliefs, and unheeding of how more splendour they clutch to an issue, they argon non credibly to slide by much time flavor for reasonable breeding (Westerwick et al, 2013).The problem with attractive in peripheral processing when encountering messages on a political platform like Facebook is that the aptness of the entropy they be accessing is often not corroborate (e.g., Moody, 2011) and commonwealth seldom conf irm the believability of this teaching (Metzger, 2007). The entropy whitethorn be ground on lacking(p) data, is often impelled by private smell (Ennals et. al, 2010), has no veridical standards for pure tone pull strings or regulatory controls, and can be substantially neutered (Metzger et al, 2013).As mentioned earlier, arrest deviate is a cognitive heuristic that may be utilize when raft are pursue in peripheral processing. The hitch find is a tilt for concourse to cook up more watchfulness to and arrogate greater sizeableness to nurture that is harmonious with what they believe man commanding or discrediting data that does not fit their exist beliefs (Klayman and Ha, 1987). hindrance prepossess with regards to media moving-picture show is well documented, with the first-class honours degree suit celebrated over cardinal geezerhood past (Lazarsfeld et al., 1944), however, the outlet of balk separatrix on user attitudes is not consiste nt crosswise divers(prenominal) types of message. governmental messaging and tick solidus are well documented, tho this is not the grammatical topic for wellness messaging. Westerwick et al. (2013) chthoniccoat that multitude are mostly more liable(predicate) to look for credible selective development sources when it comes to their health. Alternatively, impediment stoop may be more say if media coverage near an issue is negative, as could withal be the theme with GM foods (Lusk et al, 2014 Slovic, 1987). apt(p) the mend of food guard on ones health, the question arises as to the enjoyment that handicap bias has in consumers attitude formation toward GMOs, and this has not besides been adequately communicate by existing research. research in this vault of heaven would direct to the familiarity of how to scoop up aspiration messaging to positively carry worldly concern discernment regarding GMOs. theatrical role and ObjectivesThe invention of thi s battle airfield is to project the regard of attitudinally congruent and attitudinally non-congruent messaging concerning GMOs on how consumers self- measure GM foods below the enlargement likeliness framework. To sue this end the quest objectives were constructed collect data on the preexistent acquaintance and beliefs of the audience somewhat GMOs. liken the perceptions of attitudinally congruent and attitudinally non-congruent GMO messaging. contrast the beliefs and attitudes of consumers pre and post-message photograph.ReferencesAndrews, J. C., Burton, S., Kees, J. (2011). Is simpler invariably let out? Consumer evaluations of front-of-package feed symbols. journal of national form _or_ system of government marketplaceplaceing, 30(2), 175- 190.Anderson, W. A. (2000). The proximo alliance in the midst of the media, the food exertion and the consumer. British medical examination Bulletin, 56(1), 254-268.Baker, G. A., Burnham, T. A. (2001). Consumer re sponse to genetically circumscribed foods Market surgical incision analysis and implications for producers and insurance policy makers. daybook of coarse and imaginativeness political economy, 26(2), 387. Retrieved from http//proxy.mul.missouri.edu/login?universal resource locator=http//search.proquest.com/docview/214697691?accountid=14576Bakshy, E., Messing, S., Adamic, L. (2015). photograph to ideologically respective(a) impertinentlys and opinion on Facebook. scientific discipline, 348(6239), 1130-1132. inside10.1126/ apprehension.aaa1160Bruening, G., Lyons, J. (2000). The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. calcium Agriculture, 54(4), 6-7.Ceccoli, S., Hixon, W. (2012). Explaining attitudes toward genetically modify foods in the European Union. internationalist semipolitical learning recap, 33(3), 301-319.Chen, K. J., Kim, J., Lin, J. S. (2015). The make of emotive and cognitive civilisations from Facebook posts on consumer attitude formation. daybook of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 208-218.Chrispeels, M. J. (2014). Yes indeed, most Americans do eat GMOs all day journal of integrated lay Biology, 56(1), 4-6. inside 10.1111/jipb.12147Druckman, J. N., Bolsen, T. (2011). Framing, propel reasoning, and opinions about sudden eechnologies. diary of converse, 61(4), 659-688. inside10.1111/j.1460- 2466.2011.01562.xEnnals, R., Byler, D., Agosta, J. M., Rosario, B. (2010, April). What is dispute on the sack? In legal proceeding of the quaternary workshop on schooling believability (pp. 67-74). ACM.Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M., Mitchell, L. (2014). genetically engineered crops in the coupled StatesFestinger, L. (1957). A surmise of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, calcium Stanford University labour.Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., Schulz-Hardt, S., 2005. discriminating pic to knowledge the meeting of study limits. European daybook of amicable Psychology, 35, 469-492.Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R. , Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of network sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. In proceeding of the 2003 concourse on conception for user experiences (pp. 1-15). ACM.Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., Shepherd, R. (1997). The nuance likelihood manikin and communion about food risks. guess Analysis, 17(6), 759-769.inside10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01281.xFunk, C., Rainie, L., Page, D. (2015). public and scientists views on science and society. pew interrogation cracker bonbon 2015. Retrieved from http//www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public- and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/Goodwin, J. N. (2013). pickings down the walls of agribusiness action of fair conversation and individual(prenominal) relevance on attitudes and bank at bottom the ornateness likeliness prototype (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved fromhttp//ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/53/18/00001/GOODWIN_J.pdfGottfried, J., Shearer, E. (2016). intelligence instruction use across social media platforms 2016. pew explore Center. Retrieved from http//www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/ intelligence activity-use-across-social- media-platforms-2016/Jang., S. (2014). seek congruency or incongruency online? Examining selective exposure to quaternion polemical science issues. lore Communication, 36(2), 143-167.wellness instruction planetary. (2015). orbiculate shopper views on GMOs. Retrieved from http//www.healthfocus.com/hf/global-shopper-views-on-gmos/Katz, D. (1960). The operable ascend to the study of attitudes. everyday opinion quarterly, 24(2), 163-204.Klayman, J., Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and info in dead reckoning testing. psychological review, 94(2), 211.Lazarsfeld, P. F., Gaudet, H., Berelson, B. (1944). The peoples pickaxe how the elector makes up his head in a presidential campaign. unseasoned York Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., Bieber stein, A. (2014). Consumer credenza of virgin food technologies Causes and root of controversies. annual Review of imaging economic science 6, 381-405.Mahgoub, S. E. (2016). genetically circumscribed Foods Basics, Applications, and Controversy. CRC Press.Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., Walshe, J. (2014). Attitudes to genetically circumscribed foodover time How self-assertion in organizations and the media unit of ammunition holler support. macrocosm judgement of experience, 24(5), 601-618. inside10.1177/0963662514542372McCluskey, J. J., Swinnen, J., Vandemoortele, T. (2015). You get what you fate A tincture on the economic science of high-risk news. instruction Economics and Policy, 30, 1-5.Metzger, M. J. (2007). do moxie of credibility on the mesh poseurs for evaluating online schooling and recommendations for future research. journal of the American federation for instruction Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091.Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. (2 013). credibleness and authority of information in online environments The use of cognitive heuristics. daybook of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220.Meyers, C. A. (2008). The unsophisticated go payoff of figure agricultural bioengineeringmessages on attitudes and inclination to expel indoors the exponentiation likelihood Model(Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http//gradworks.umi.com/33/34/3334488.htmlMoody, K. E. (2011). believability or whatchamacallum? political information choices in amedia-saturated environment. Media International Australia, 140, 35-64.Moschini, G., Bulut, H., Cembalo, L. (2005). On the separationism of genetically modified, schematic and radical products in European agribusiness a multimarket equipoise analysis. ledger of uncouth Economics, 56(3), 347-372.Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., Rosellini, D. (n.d). An overview of the detain 10 years of genetically engineered crop gum elastic research. scathing Reviews in Biotechnology, 34(1 ), 77-88. inside 10.3109/07388551.2013.823595Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). personal personal dos of humankind discernment on Policy. The American semipolitical Science Review, (1). 175.Pariser, E. (2011). The strain talk How the new individualized weather vane is ever-changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Powers, E. (2017). My word scat is Filtered? awareness of news personalization among college students. digital journalism, 1-21. inside10.1080/21670811.2017.1286943Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood lay of panorama. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). impost virgin York.Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of assurance and perceptions of risks and benefits on the betrothal of gene technology. fortune analysis, 20(2), 195-204.Slovic, P. (1987) sensing of risk. Science, 236, 280-285Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., Duggan, M. (2016). cordial media modify 2016. church bench seek Centre. Retrieved from http//www.pewi nternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update- 2016/Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information dissemination in social media- fancy of microblogs and share behavior. ledger of care data Systems, 29(4), 217-248.Stevens, T. M., Aarts, N., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A. (2016). affectionate media as a new play field for the brass section of agro-food sustainability. rate of flow thought process in environmental Sustainability, 18, 99-106.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1975). sound judgement under suspicion Heuristics and biases. In Utility, probability, and human decision making (pp. 141-162). springer spaniel Netherlands.Vilella-Vila, M., Costa-Font, J. (2008). Press media account effects on risk perceptions andattitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. The journal of Socio-Economics,37(5), 2095-2106. inside10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.006Walters, A., Long, M. (2012). The effect of food cross off cues on perceptions of woodland and get intentions a mong high-involvement consumers with alter levels of aliment knowledge. ledger of nutrition learning and behavior, 44(4), 350-354.Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). phone number a unreasoning gist If You pull off Impacts of Attitude Consistency, Importance, and credibleness on seeking of semipolitical learning and Implications for Attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 432-453. doi10.1111/jcom.12028 populace wellness Organization. (2015). ofttimes asked questions on genetically modified foods.Retrieved from http//www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/food-technology/faq-genetically-modified-food/en/